Posted on : Dec.19,2005 08:53 KST Modified on : Dec.19,2005 08:53 KST

Kim Seon Jong, who along with Hwang Woo Suk and Roh Sung Il is one of the most key figures in the stem cell controversy, has spoken. Subsequently it has become clear that the 2005 article in the journal Science was a fabrication, but many questions remain unresolved.

What that means is that Seoul National University's (SNU) inquiry committee has a heavier burden on its shoulders. Korea's scientific community, now the object of international suspicion, will have a hard time recovering if the committee fails to find the truth, and that is why it needs to use whatever help is available. Depending on what course the inquiry takes, it needs to think about having it handled at the national government level.

A few things have to be kept in mind for the inquiry to go properly.

To begin with, it should not be limited to the 2005 article. International scholars are calling into question other research achievements such as the article from 2004. While they're at it, committee members should make sure no suspicions of any kind remain.


In addition, they need to look at the activities of persons not associated with SNU. That in particular is one area that will need active involvement from the national government.

They also need to beware of calls for the inquiry to be handed over to an outside body such as the prosecution. Experts are saying that if the committee gets the opportunity to pursue every detail of notes from the experiments and other related documentation, arriving at the fact of the case will not be impossible. It is important that Korean science show that is capable of solving such problems. Questions that just cannot be answered and any signs of illegality can be looked at later by the prosecution.

Finally, the committee must prevent any attempts to link the inquiry to anything unrelated to the essence of the issue at hand, such as redoing the stem cell experiment. The key issue is whether the article as based on fabrications and whether the results of the research were exaggerated. Whether Hwang's researchers possess the technology to do what they say they can do is a question for later.

What responsibility government officials like Cheong Wa Dae aide for science and technology policy Park Gi Yeong have to bear is something that also must be examined. Hwang's researchers were receiving a massive amount of government funding, so there needs to be answers to questions such as whether officials were thorough in verifying the authenticity of the research, whether they learned about the fabrications and yet remained silent, and if perhaps they cooperated in a cover-up. The first step in preventing a reoccurrence of something similar will be seeing who needs to be held responsible.

The Hankyoreh, 19 December 2005.

[Translations by Seoul Selection]

related stories
  • 오피니언

multimedia

most viewed articles

hot issue